Legal Opinion
Elmendorf v. Poprocki
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 23, 1967PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
The plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action against the defendant, the con-servatrix of the estate of John Poprocki, an incapable person, to recover the reasonable value of services he claimed to have rendered to the estate of the ward. The action was brought against the con-servatrix solely in her fiduciary capacity and not against her as an individual. The plaintiff alleged that on November 2, 1960, the eonservatrix entered *117into an agreement with Howard C. Merk, wherein she, as conservatrix, gave Merk an option to purchase, on or before December 30, 1960, a certain ten-acre…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. EgglestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Stempel v. Middletown Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Johnson's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Metz v. Hvass Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Shippee v. Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Kerin v. StangleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Department of Social Services v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Marcus v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Cottrell v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.