Legal Opinion
Providence Gas Co. v. Burke
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided February 21, 1984No. 82-340-M.P., 82-341-M.PPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLEHER Justice.
On September 28, 1981, the Providence Gas Company! (company) filed with the Public Utilities Commission (commission) a schedule of pi signed to prodt in revenues, authority of G § 39-3-11, as 236, § 2, suspe oposed rate increases de-ce an additional $12,821,714 'he commission, under the L.1966 (1977 Reenactment) amended by P.L.1977, ch. tided the proposed effective date of the new schedules.
Section 39-3-11 allows the suspension of the effective date for an initial five-month period and subsequent three-month period if additional tinjie is needed. The purpose of these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rhode Island Consumers' Council v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. DeLombaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- DiLuglio v. Providence Auto Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- D'Ambra v. North Providence School CommitteeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- In Re Review of Proposed Town of New Shoreham ProjectSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- In Re Woonsocket Water DepartmentSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.