Legal Opinion
Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 23, 1977PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELAHANTY, Justice.
Mechanic Falls Water Company (Mechanic Falls), Caribou Water Works Corporation (Caribou), Ellsworth Water Company (Ells-worth), Washburn Water Company (Wash-burn), and Fort Kent Water Company (Fort Kent) have appealed from decisions rendered by the Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in their respective utility rate cases. 1 Each company seeks review under 35 M.R.S.A. § 303 (§ 303) 2 and 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 (§ 305). 3 Except for the disallowance by the Commission of Ellsworth’s standpipe painting expense, we affirm the Commission’s decision in each of the above-mentioned…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Application of Hawaii Elec. Light Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.