Legal Opinion

Narragansett Electric Co. v. Burke

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 11, 1986No. 84-73-M.P., 84-232-M.P. and 84-342-M.PPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEVILACQUA, Chief Justice.

This case is before us on Narragansett Electric Company’s petition for certiorari pursuant to G.L.1956 (1984 Reenactment) § 39-5-1 seeking a review of the Public Utilities Commission's (the commission) February 1, 1984 report and order retroactively reducing Narragansett’s rates, ordering refunds, and summarily adjusting its future charges.

In March 1983, Narragansett received $5.2 million in rate relief from the commission. At this time, the commission determined that 15.2 percent was a fair and reasonable return on its investment.

On August 1, 1983,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  2. Myers v. Blair Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Providence Gas Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Roberts v. Narragansett Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  5. South County Gas Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Elizabethtown Water Co. v. New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. South Cent. Bell v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Joplin v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Superior Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API