Legal Opinion

Rhode Island Consumers' Council v. Smith

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 28, 1973No. 1784-M.P., 1786-M.PPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoslin, J.

This is a public utility rate case. On April 16, 1971, the New England Telephone & Telegraph Company (“the company”), under authority of G. L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §39-3-11, as amended by P. L. 1969, ch. 240, sec. 5, filed with the Public Utilities Commission (“the commission”) a tariff revision designed to add approximately $14,800,000 to its annual revenue. While the company had scheduled the new tariffs to take effect on May 15, 1971, their inception was suspended initially by a mm mission order entered under §39-3-11, as amended, and, according to the parties, thereafter from time to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  2. In Re Kauai Electric Division of Citizens Utilities Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Narragansett Electric Co. v. HarschSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Public Utilities Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API