Legal Opinion
State v. ROSS V.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 26, 2008No. AC 28251PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVEME, J.
The defendant, Ross V., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1) and two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted constancy of accusation and impermissible hearsay evidence and (2) denied his motion for a continuance to obtain new counsel. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Peatie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Heyse v. CaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. CrawleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.