Legal Opinion
Heyse v. Case
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 2, 2009No. AC 29289PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
An insurance company’s duty to provide its insured with indemnity, or to undertake a defense on the insured’s behalf, depends on whether the terms of the insurance policy provide coverage for the dispute in which the insured is engaged. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co. v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 274 Conn. 457, 463, 876 A.2d 1139 (2005). In this case, the principal issue is whether a title insurance policy provided coverage for a dispute about subdivision rights between the insured and another member of a planned community organized under General Statutes § 47-220.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. SakonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Mara v. OttoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- A Priori Family Office LLC v. Valley Forge Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Candeloro v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Heyse v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.