Legal Opinion

State v. Crawley

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 11, 2012No. AC 32610PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The defendant, Scott A. Crawley, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of various offenses related to two separate incidents. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly proceeded with the trial in his absence without ascertaining that he validly waived his right to confrontation, (2) failed to grant a continuance to allow him to obtain alternative counsel and (3) failed to hold a second competency hearing.1 We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The defendant’s appeal involves two files for offenses committed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Fagan v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fine v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. In re Jason M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Crawley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API