Legal Opinion
State v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 11, 1994No. 14704PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The certified issue in this criminal appeal is the proper standard for appellate review of a trial court’s denial of a motion for continuance to retain private counsel. The state charged the defendant, William Hamilton, Jr., with robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2), burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (1), attempted assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (1) and 53a-49 (a) (2), and carrying a pistol without a permit in violation of General Statutes §§ 29-35 and 29-37 (b). A…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. LapointeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.