Legal Opinion
Call v. Alcan Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1967No. Civ. 11293PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Plaintiff Norman Call was the drywall and painting subcontractor for a low rent housing project located in Yuba City. Defendant Alcan Pacific Company was the prime contractor. On July 25, 1963, Call withdrew his employees from the job. On the same date, July 25 (a Thursday), Alcan sent Call a telegram stating: “Tour repeated failure to prosecute work diligently, including, but not limited to, the failure to maintain full crews and also pulling your crews off the Richland Housing Project, the most recent [of] which occurred today, you are hereby notified that unless you resume work with a full…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Benard v. WalkupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- T&R Painting Construction Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Weisz Trucking Co. v. Emil R. Wohl ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.