Legal Opinion

State v. Sidden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1986No. 487A84PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Justice.

Defendants Blankenship and Sidden

The defendants jointly argue three assignments of error. Two of these assignments concern testimony by prosecution witnesses regarding Claude Johnson’s reputation in the community, and the third assignment relates to testimony offered by SBI Agent Kenneth Sneed as to the reputation of George Torrealba, one of the defendants’ alibi witnesses.

The defendants first argue that the trial court erred by permitting Earl Gambill to testify concerning Claude Johnson’s repu tation. The defendants object to Gambill’s testimony on the ground that it was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Ward v. Durham Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API