Legal Opinion

State v. Stokes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1987No. 553A83PublishedCited by 297 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a new sentencing hearing ordered by this Court in State v. Stokes, 308 N.C. 634, 304 S.E. 2d 184 (1983), at which a death sentence was imposed. Defendant contends: (1) The court lacked jurisdiction over him; (2) there was error in admitting his out-of-court statement; (3) the evidence was insufficient to support the “especially heinous” aggravating circumstance and submission of an Enmund issue1 to the jury; and (4) his death sentence was excessive or disproportionate when considered against sentences imposed in similar cases. We find no error in the…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by297 opinions

  1. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API