State v. Russell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant’s primary contention on this appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the cocaine seized from the airplane as the fruit of an illegal search and seizure. The trial court below conducted a hearing on the motion pursuant to G.S. 15A-977(d). At the conclusion of the hearing, the court made extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. Based on these findings and conclusions, the court ruled that the search of the plane and the luggage on board was valid on two alternative theories. First, the pilot of the plane had freely given his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. IsleibSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. MilienCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. BogleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. IsleibSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.