Legal Opinion

Reemer v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2005No. 34S02-0502-CR-58PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that expert witnesses or laboratory results are not required to prove the composition of an over-the-counter or pre-seription drug when it is found in an unaltered state and its weight and contents are described in the required labeling.

Facts and Procedural History

Over-the-counter cold and allergy tablets containing ephedrine or pseudoephed-rine are a principal source of chemicals used in the manufacturing of methamphetamine. For that reason, in recent years retailers have been requested to. report any customers who purchase quantities of products containing those…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CassiereCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. State v. HeuserSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. United States v. Cecil Ray JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Boggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Shaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Speybroeck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. ReaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API