Legal Opinion

Speybroeck v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2007No. 20A05-0701-CR-40PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

William J. Speybroeck (“William”) appeals his convictions for Fraud on a Financial Institution, a Class C felony, and Identity Deception, as a Class D felony, following a jury trial. He presents two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether the State properly authenticated business documents pursuant to Indiana Evidence Rule 902(9).

2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting documents into evidence under Indiana Evidence Rule 803(6), the business records exception to the hearsay rule.

3.Whether a retrial is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stahl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Darnell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.T.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Jaramillo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Reemer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Thomas Mack v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. David L. Kimbrough v. Ramona F. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. David Holbert v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Techna-Fit, Inc. and Stuart Trotter v. Fluid Transfer Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Alexander Holmes v. National Collegiate Student Loan TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API