Legal Opinion

State v. Reay

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2009No. 24477PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant appeals his conviction for the murder of his wife. We affirm.

Background

[¶2.] Defendant, Brad Reay, his wife, Tamara (Tami), and their daughter, Hay-lee, lived in Pierre, South Dakota. Defendant was an assistant manager at Wal-Mart. Tami worked in the shoe department at Kmart. She met Brian Clark, who also worked at Kmart. He was married with children. In December 2005, Tami and Brian began an affair.

[¶ 3.] In the first week of February 2006, Tami told defendant she wanted to date other people: she wanted a divorce. Defendant wanted to work things out. He…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. State v. HeumillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. DokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. KlaudtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. MuhmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. DanielsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. PattersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API