Legal Opinion

Hammon v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2005No. 52S02-0412-CR-510PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER FROM THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS, NO. 52A02-08308-CR-693.

BOEHM, Justice.

The Sixth Amendment as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 18354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), prohibits the introduction in a criminal trial of testimonial statements where the defendant had no opportunity to cross examine the person who made the statements. We hold that statements to investigating officers in response to general initial inquiries are nontestimonial but statements made for purposes of preserving the accounts of potential…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne CannonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. BlacksherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API