Legal Opinion

United States v. Cassiere

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 16, 1993No. 92-2073, 92-2074 and 92-2182PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

In these consolidated appeals the three defendants challenge their convictions of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit that offense on various grounds. The fraud involved an intricate and sophisticated scheme involving a technique known as a “land flip,” under which real property is purchased for a low price, immediately resold at a much higher price to a straw or fictitious buyer, and the higher resale price is used as the basis for obtaining a mortgage loan that finances the entire transaction. One of the defendants also challenges her sentence. We affirm.

I

A…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Perez-De-Munoz v. Volvo Car Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. John McTiernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Marina Zarnes, Michael W. Nietupski, Jeffrey L. Hunter, Benny L. Battles, Michael R. Dionne, Marvin G. Bland, and Thomas J. NietupskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API