Legal Opinion
D. Moody & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 4, 1984No. 296-83CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and plaintiff's opposition thereto. The court is presented with the difficult question of determining the viability of the Fulford doctrine after enactment of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-563, 92 Stat. 2383 (codified as amended at 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 601-613 (West Supp.1983)) (the “CDA”).
FACTS
Plaintiff D. Moody & Co., Inc., entered into a contract with the United States Air Force on June 19, 1980, for the delivery of 50 units of aircraft sleeves, which are tubular machine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Cosmic Construction Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Placeway Construction Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- The Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad Company, a Maryland Corporation v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission (Wmatc)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Z.A.N. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- United States v. Kasler Electric Company, Inc., Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Gunn-Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- H.H.O. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Ralcon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.