Legal Opinion
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 18, 1962No. 434PublishedCited by 374 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The question this case presents is whether § 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act, in giving federal courts jurisdiction of suits between employers and unions for breach of collective bargaining agreements,1 impliedly repealed § 4 of the pre-existing Norris-LaGuardia Act, which, with certain exceptions not here material, barred federal courts from issuing injunctions “in any case involving or growing out of any labor dispute.” 2
*197The complaint here was filed by the petitioner Sinclair Refining Company against the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union and Local 7-210 of that union and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by374 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
369 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.