Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeaweix, J.
The statute of limitations having been pleaded, the burden was on the plaintiff to show that his cause of action against the defendant accrued within three years prior to the institution of the suit. Southerland v. Crump, 199 N. C., 111, 153 S. E., 845; Phillips v. Penland, 196 N. C., 425, 147 S. E., 731; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32; Marks v. McLeod, 203 N. C., 257, 165 S. E., 693; Aldridge v. Dixon, 205 N. C., 480, 171 S. E., 777.
While the plaintiff could not have brought and maintained his action until some injury to his property had occurred by reason of the alleged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mobley v. Murray CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Phillips v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Marks v. . McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Williams v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.