Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rankin v. . Oates

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1922PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1DissentClark, C. J.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged wrongful conversion of plaintiff's automobile.

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, the jury returned the following verdict:

"1. Did the defendant wrongfully convert to his own use the property of the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: `Yes.'
"2. Is the plaintiff's cause of action barred by the statute of limitations? Answer: `No.'
"3. What damages is the plaintiff entitled to recover by reason of the conversion of said car? Answer: `$1,875.'"

After the rendition of the verdict, his Honor set aside the jury's finding as to the bar…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Butts v. . ScrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Cherry v. Canal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Settee v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. In Re Will of TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted, Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Temple v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API