Legal Opinion

Shearin v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1957No. 384PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Where, upon waiver of jury trial in accordance with G.S. 1-184, the court makes no specific findings of fact but enters judgment of involuntary nonsuit, the only question presented is whether the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, would support findings of fact upon which plaintiff could recover. Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486; Harrison v. Brown, 222 N.C. 610, 24 S.E. 2d 470; Insurance Co. v. Carolina Beach, 216 N.C. 778, 7 S.E. 2d 13.

The legal obligations of a physician or surgeon who undertakes to treat a patient are well established. Nash v.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API