Legal Opinion

Phillips v. . Penland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 2, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Tbe judge charged tbe jury as follows: “Tbe court charges you that if you find by tbe greater weight of evidence that tbe deceased, Mrs. Penland, in 1925, paid tbe sum of $40.00 to tbe plaintiff, and that such payment was made with the intention and understanding between them that tbe payment was to be credited by tbe plaintiff upon a running account between plaintiff and Mrs. Penland for services rendered to Mrs. Penland by tbe plaintiff, and that such payment was of such a nature and made in such a way as to imply in law that tbe debtor acknowledged tbe debt as still existing, and implied a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Cashmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd & KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Hewlett v. . SchenckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Cone v. Hyatt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Duke University v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Whitley's Electric Service, Inc. v. SherrodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Little v. . ShoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Marks v. . McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API