Legal Opinion

Marks v. . McLeod

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

That Alf. H. McLeod was acting as agent of his wife in signing the contract of sale may be presumed from the subsequent ratification or execution of the deed undertaking to convey the timber in accordance with the prior agreement. Starkweather v. Gravely, 187 N. C., 526, 122 S. E., 297. But it is doubted whether the evidence shows the 50-acre tract was intended to be included in the contract of sale. The description in the deed is by metes and bounds, and it is not included therein. Plaintiffs say they did not know of its omission from the deed until their grantee was stopped from cutting the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Peacock v. Barnes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Tillery v. Whiteville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Starkweather v. . GravelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. J. F. Wilkerson Contracting Co. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Drinkwater v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Davis v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Duplin County v. . EzzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API