Legal Opinion
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minneapolis v. City of Lakeville
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 30, 1995No. C6-94-2197PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
A Lakeville city ordinance requires removal of nonconforming billboards as a condition of land development. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. leased advertising space on outdoor structures in Lakeville. When five property owners terminated Naegele’s leases in order to develop their properties, Naegele sued Lakeville for damages, a declaration of its rights, and initiation of condemnation proceedings. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Lakeville. On appeal, Naegele argues: (1) Lakeville’s sign ordinance constitutes governmental confiscation of private…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. HalleckSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Christensen v. Mower CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Eagle Lake of Becker County Lake Ass'n v. Becker County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Yeh v. County of CassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.