Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Mower County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1998No. C3-98-1050PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant sued respondent county, claiming the county negligently failed to place warning signs on the road after seal-coating. The district court entered summary judgment for the county on the grounds of statutory immunity. We reverse. .
FACTS
On September 5, 1996, employees of respondent Mower County seal-coated a section of County State Aid Highway 7 (Highway 7). This process involved covering the road with oil and limestone chips. A roller then passed over the seal-coated segment to press the limestone chips into the oil. The limestone chips were to be left for one to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Steinke v. City of AndoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Conlin v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Fear v. Independent School District 911Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Olmanson v. Le Sueur CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.