Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kavanaugh
*1926 The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment constrains governmental actors and protects private actors. To draw the line between governmental and private, this Court applies what is known as the state-action doctrine. Under that doctrine, as relevant here, a private entity may be considered a state actor when it exercises a function "traditionally exclusively reserved to the State." Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. , 419 U.S. 345 , 352, 95 S.Ct. 449 , 42 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974).
This state-action case concerns the public access channels on Time Warner's cable system in Manhattan. Public access…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by460 opinions
- Inner City Contracting LLC v. Charter Twp. of NorthvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Donald Phillips v. Shastine Tangilag, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Allen v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Christopher De Rossitte v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
455 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.