Legal Opinion

Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2006No. 216 C.D. 2006PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this zoning appeal, we are asked whether the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court) erred in affirming a decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Smithfield Township (ZHB) that required Adams Outdoor Advertising, L.P. (Applicant) to remove two off-premises advertising billboards it leases. Applicant raises several validity challenges to a zoning ordinance provision that requires removal of commercial advertising signs on property where land development is proposed. Because the ZHB and the trial court properly rejected these challenges, we affirm.

Gerald…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Tri-County Landfill, Inc. v. Pine Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Thw Group, LLC v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Plaxton v. Lycoming County Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Aldridge v. Jackson TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API