Legal Opinion

Britta v. Ehnert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1929No. Nos. 27,164, 27,165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

These actions by wife and husband to recover damages for personal injuries to the former were tried together. After ver diets, for plaintiffs, defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.'

Plaintiff Britta Truso is a sister of defendant’s wife. Defendant is the owner of an automobile, which early in November, 1927, he drove on an extended journey from St. Paul into Wisconsin. The purpose was to visit the parents of Britta Truso and defendant’s wife at Rhinelander. The former accompanied the party as defendant’s guest, and on the return journey…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Boyd v. CloseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. O'Shea v. LavoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stenstrom v. BloostonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Burdick v. BongardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Shockman v. Union Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Berlin v. KoblasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Hardgrove v. BadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API