Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Koblas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1931No. 28,394PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff while riding in the automobile of the defendant driven by her. The court directed a verdict for the defendant. Upon reconsideration it granted the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground of error. The defendant appeals.

The plaintiff and the defendant left Minneapolis in the afternoon of June 25, 1929, in the defendant’s auto on a vacation trip to the Black'Hills, South Dakota. A few miles beyond Iroquois, South Dakota, the auto glided to the side of the road, overturned two or three times, and the plaintiff was injured.

By the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. O'Brien v. WoldsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Johnson v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Frisorger v. ShepseMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Johnson v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. White Ex Rel. White v. McVickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Lynghaug v. PayteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API