Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Close

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 27, 1927No. 11,734PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

Plaintiff in error brought this action against defendants in error for damages occasioned by an automobile collision. The parties are hereinafter referred to as in the trial court, or by name.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court sustained Mrs. Phillips’ motion for a nonsuit as to her. At the close of all the evidence the court overruled plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint to conform to the proof by alleging a joint enterprise, and sustained the motions of Close and Phillips for directed verdicts as to them. Motion for new trial was overruled and to review the judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. HaffnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  2. Howard v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Golden Eagle Dry Goods Co. v. MockbeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Saint Mary's Academy of the Sisters of Loretta v. NewhagenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Livingston v. BarneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Mayer v. SampsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Mortensen v. KnightArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Globe Cereal Mills v. Shirlee S. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API