Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Bongard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1959No. 37,647PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative a new trial.

On August 5, 1956, at 4:30 p. m. an automobile jointly owned by plaintiff, Stanley R. Burdick, and his wife was involved in a collision with an automobile owned and driven by defendant, James H. Bongard. The facts leading up to the accident follow.

Cedar Street in St. Paul runs generally north and south. North of the area where Thirteenth Street crosses Cedar Street in an easterly-westerly direction, Cedar Street is divided by a grass boulevard…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Hanson v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Olson v. IscheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Nadeau v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Sumner v. AmacherMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Pierson v. EdstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API