Legal Opinion

Stenstrom v. Blooston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1929No. Nos. 27,256, 27,453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

These two actions for personal injuries arising out of the same accident and tried together resulted in verdicts for the plaintiffs. Defendant made a motion in each for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was denied. Judgments were entered thereafter, and he appealed therefrom. The sole question presented is whether the plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

The parties are residents of the city of Minneapolis. The plaintiffs are brothers. A business deal was pending between the plaintiffs and the defendant, and they arranged to drive to St.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Jones v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Berlin v. KoblasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Hardgrove v. BadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Britta v. EhnertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Moran v. MoranNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API