Legal Opinion

City of Howell v. Kaal

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1954No. Docket 72, Calendar 46,048PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

This is a zoning ordinance ease in which defendants appeal from decree enjoining violation, hy operation of a trailer camp.. They own 4-1/2 acres, of which approximately 3/4 is situated within plaintiff city and 1/4 in the adjoining township. The city portion lies in an area zoned since 1942 as E-A (residential-agricultural), in which the ordinance permits single or 2-family dwellings, nurseries, greenhouses, truck farming, farms, stables, riding acadamies and necessary accessory buildings on plots of 5 acres or more, but on smaller acreages use is limited to single or 2-family dwellings.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richards v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Moreland v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Janesick v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ervin Acceptance Co. v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Loose v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. LlewellynMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Miller v. Fabius Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Roll v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Mich. Gun Owners, Inc. v. Ann Arbor Pub. Sch.Michigan Supreme Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API