Legal Opinion

Janesick v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1953No. Docket 42; Calendar 45,788PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

On November 7,1951, plaintiffs and appellees herein, Anthony and Johanna Janesick, filed a bill in chancery seeking to have zoning ordinances 171-D and 180-E of the city of Detroit declared void insofar as they purport to limit the use of certain land owned by plaintiffs to residential purposes. They alleged that the ordinances, as applied to their property, were an arbitrary and unreasonable exercise of the city’s police power and confiscatory, and for those reasons should be declared invalid as violating the provisions of the Michigan Constitution (1908), art 2, § 16, and the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Muskegon Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hammond v. Bloomfield Hills Building InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ervin Acceptance Co. v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ritenour v. Township of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Alderton v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. White v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API