Legal Opinion

Roll v. City of Troy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1963No. Calendar 49, Docket 49,372PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In 1958, plaintiffs purchased land in defendant city desiring to subdivide the property into residential lots. At the time of the purchase the city had in force and effect a comprehensive zoning ordinance which would, when applied to the subject land, restrict the lots to a minimum of 30,000 square feet in area. Each lot was to he not less than 150 feet in width and not less than 200 feet in depth. The plaintiffs wanted to subdivide their property into lots of over 100 feet in width, with an average depth of 150 feet, each lot thus containing about 15,000 square feet.

The request for rezoning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Senefsky v. City of Huntington WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Moreland v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. City of Howell v. KaalMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Biske v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. MATTER OF FULLING v. PalumboNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API