Legal Opinion

People v. Llewellyn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1977No. 56872, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is an appeal of convictions for exhibition of two allegedly obscene films under an East Detroit anti-obscenity ordinance. Defendants argue that their convictions must be reversed because the anti-obscenity ordinance in question is pre-empted by the existing state statutory scheme governing criminal obscenity offenses, and is thus unconstitutional under Const 1963, art 7, § 22.

Given the comprehensive coverage of the field under the state statutory scheme, MCLA 750.343a et seq.; MSA 28.575(1) et seq., and the need for a uniform, statewide definition of criminal obscenity offenses for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Ter Beek v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. City of Detroit v. QuallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rental Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. NeumayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API