Legal Opinion
Bristow v. City of Woodhaven
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 1971No. Docket 9613PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.
We have before us once again a zoning matter, this time dealing with the proposed construction of a trailer park on a specified parcel of land in the City of Woodhaven.
Woodhaven was incorporated in 1965. It annexed the property involved herein on June 1,1967, and by virtue of zoning ordinance #20, enacted November 1, 1967, restricted the subject property to single family residential uses (R-2).
Plaintiff Bristow owns and presently farms 40 acres lying just inside the southwest boundary line of the City of Woodhaven. Plaintiff Deziel has a purchase agreement interest in the property, and, if…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Berenson v. Town of New CastleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.