Legal Opinion

Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9938PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea Well, J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of dismissal entered upon demurrer sustained without leave to amend. The demurrer was based upon general grounds and upon the more specific ground that the alleged claim sued upon was not presented to the defendant City of Los Angeles “within six months after the occurrence from which the alleged damages arose or within six months after the claim accrued,’’ as provided by the charter of said city.

The property involved has its situs at and upon San Pedro Bay, city and county of Los Angeles, and is a part of the tidal lands held in trust, by the City of Los…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Bancroft v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API