Legal Opinion

Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1943No. L. A. No. 18534PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendant Los Angeles Junction Railway Company, a corporation, appeals from a judgment entered *116on the verdict of a jury for damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiffs in a railroad crossing accident.

Defendant operates a railroad in Los Angeles County. Its tracks, extending easterly and westerly, cross at grade Atlantic Boulevard, a four lane surfaced highway, extending northerly and southerly. On the south side of the tracks and the east side of the highway there was located a wigwag signal, the customary post with cross arms warning of the presence of the crossing, and another…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Plank v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API