Legal Opinion
Cox v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1950No. Civ. 17592PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*380VALLÉE, J.
This is a companion case to McGowan v. City of Los Angeles, post, p. 386 [223 P.2d 862]. It was tried with the McGowan, McFadden and Estes cases. The jury found for the defendant. As we said in the McGowan case, the verdict in this ease obviously was predicated on the finding that Cox, the driver of the car, was guilty of contributory negligence. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The assignments of error are: (1) The implied finding that Cox was guilty of contributory negligence is not supported by the evidence. (2) Errors in declining to give, and in giving, instructions.
In the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McGowan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Blanton v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Moore v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evje v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Goodwin v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Von Hasseln v. Von HasselnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Cox v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950