Legal Opinion

Evje v. City Title Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1953No. Civ. 15535PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The reciprocal actions in the case involve the sole question whether a promissory note of $12,000 payable to defendant and cross-complainant Emma De Voto, further called De Voto, signed in April, 1929, by certain Mohr’s Incorporated, further called Mohr’s, and secured by a deed of trust on certain tract of land in San Francisco, of which plaintiff and cross-defendant A. W. Evje, further called Evje, acquired a parcel in November, 1950, has been paid in full so that the deed of trust should be reconveyed or that part of the indebtedness and interest, taxes, et cetera, remain unpaid so that De…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lane v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Lind v. ClossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Romero v. EustaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. EnnisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. North American Capacity Insurance v. Claremont Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API