Legal Opinion

Von Hasseln v. Von Hasseln

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1953No. Civ. 19765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

The parties to this action are brothers. The plaintiff, William, alleges in his complaint that he is the owner and entitled to possession of a parcel of realty in Los Angeles; that defendant wrongfully entered and ousted him, took possession of the property and asserts an adverse interest therein which claim is without right.

By his answer, defendant alleges sole ownership of the property in him, and denies that plaintiff has any right, title or interest thereto.

Upon the issues framed by the pleadings, and an affirmative answer to the following interrogatory presented' to it, the jury returned…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sherman v. SandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Collins v. County of Monterey Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Doran v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Doran v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API