Legal Opinion
McGowan v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1950No. Docket Nos. 17593, 17594, 17595PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.
These are three appeals by defendant from judgments for plaintiffs. The McGowan and Estes actions are for damages for personal injuries. The MePadden action is for damages for wrongful death. The actions were tried together. We state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs-respondents.
On July 27, 1947, plaintiffs McGowan and Estes, and Cleven MeFadden, Jr., deceased son of plaintiff Cleven MeFadden, together with Wirth Tyree and John Anderson, were passengers in an automobile driven by Charles Cox. The accident occurred in the intersection of Colorado Street and Lincoln Boulevard…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Luthringer v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Ogilvie v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.