Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Gannoe
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 3, 1951No. Civ. A. 8921PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
This suit is brought under provisions of Part II of .the Interstate Commerce Act, 1 and particularly Section 222(b) 2 . The Interstate Commerce Commission asserts that the defendant, Clarence E. Gannoe, is a common or contract carrier by motor vehicle as these terms are defined in the Act; and, since he does not have a certificate or a permit issued by the Commission authorizing such operations, the Commission requests that he should be enjoined from transporting property in interstate commerce for compensation.
After final hearing, the court is of the opinion that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. F & F Truck Leasing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1960
- Drum v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1960
- State v. L. P. Gas Transport Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Haden v. RhodesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.