Allen v. United States
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CARSWELL, District Judge.
This Court was convened in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 2284 and 2325 on petition of plaintiffs for review of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission.
The Commission’s order requires plaintiffs, and others with whom they have common interest, to cease and desist certain practices which the Commission held to be violation of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.
Despite rather voluminous testimony preceding this juncture, the issues are simple, and the facts are undisputed. Stated briefly, the Commission found that the facts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Western Paper Makers' Chemical Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Atlanta-New Orleans Motor Freight Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1961
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1970
- Keller Industries, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, National Motor, Freight Traffic Association, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.