Legal Opinion
Drum v. United States
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 15, 1960No. Civ. A. 8708PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHANDLER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs instituted this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398 and Sections 2321 through 2325 to vacate, set aside and annul certain orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered in a proceeding initiated by the Commission on its own motion under Section 204(c) of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U. S.C.A. § 304(c)), and to enjoin the Commission from enforcing or attempting to enforce said orders.
The Commission by order of August 28, 1957, began an investigation under said Section 204(c) of the Act to determine whether the individual plaintiffs, Marion W. Daves,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- A. W. Stickle & Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. F & F Truck Leasing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. LassiterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1962
- United States v. The City Of Jackson, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Schultz Transit, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.