Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. F & F Truck Leasing Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1948No. Civ. A. 2593PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOYCE, District Judge.
The Interstate Commerce Commission pursuant to Section 222(b) of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, Title 49 U.S. C.A. § 322(b), seeks the issuance of an injunction to restrain F & F Truck Leasing Co., a corporation, from engaging in the transportation of property by motor vehicle on public highways for compensation without first having obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity as a common carrier or a permit to engage in the business of a contract carrier as required by Section 206(a) and 209(a) of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Irwin v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Thomson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Motor Haulage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
- United States v. SteffkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Brown v. BonesteeleOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- United States v. GunnDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. IsnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
- Public Service Commission v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.