Calixto v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
This special action review of an Industrial Commission award raises the sole question of whether a notice of claim status terminating temporary disability and medical benefits was valid. We affirm the hearing officer’s determination that it was valid.
The relevant facts are as follows. On December 20, 1969, petitioner sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as a farm laborer for Yuco Gin Company, the respondent employer. The State Compensation Fund, the respondent carrier, accepted his workmen’s compensation claim and paid…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Talley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Roseberry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Nelson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Van Sickle v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DeGroot v. Arizona Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Far North Sanitation, Inc. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Neal v. City of KingmanArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Rouse v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.